Calls Needed – Florida SB 596 and HB 687 bills – “Advanced Wireless Infrastructure Wireless Deployment Act”

[ALERT, transportation needed: Some of our citizen-advocates are looking for transportation to Tallahassee in order to OPPOSE this legislation. If you live in Central or SW Florida and wish to carpool  to Tallahassee, please contact us by sending an email to …

The following is an update from ]

These bills are now heading to the Florida Senate (SB 596) and House (HB 687) Floors for votes. Your calls to your representatives are needed by Wednesday, April 26, 2017. Find your Florida legislators contact numbers at these links: (Note: These bills do not concern your US reps (Rubio/Nelson) 

A Small Cell without screening or common sense design standards. Imagine one of these for each carrier in front of your home, blasting your family with radiation 24/7.

Florida Senate –

Florida House –

Last month we wrote about some bills being filed to streamline the deployment of what the industry calls “small cells” infrastructure. They cleverly call them small cells, but applications filed have some at 120 feet tall and some come with refrigerator sized equipment boxes. These bills (Senate Bill 596 and House Bill 687) were written by the wireless industry in an attempt to have the Florida state legislators preempt local siting processes and provide cheap access to our public infrastructure and rights of way. This is an invasion on residential neighborhoods as public rights of way and infrastructure are impacted. Most people don’t realize it but the property in front of our homes as well as sometimes other parts (back and side yards) have public rights of way. Yes we mow all the lawn and pay the property taxes but certain portions of your property are not subject to your full control. These are usually areas where you find light posts, utility poles and street signs.

Anyway, although all the cities, counties and municipalities vehemently opposed this bill, Tallahassee basically told them “tough,” and the now former (forced to resign) Senator Artiles actually told them at the end of the first meeting to “go and negotiate your best deal.” There has been little debate nor mention or concern by all sides that this is OUR property.

Well, they have been negotiating and the bill has gone through many strike all changes. Our local governments basically accepted the local preemption, got a few protective clauses inserted, brought the height limitations they can set down to 50 feet from 60 feet and now are haggling over price (annual rent). The original rent was $15 and it now stands at $150 per pole.

Other changes, since man is not created equal – The Florida Dept of Transportation managed to get themselves exempted along with the municipal electric and cooperative electric companies. The Villages retirement community managed to get themselves exempted. Some barrier islands, less than 5 miles, 10K inhabitants who recently voted to underground (could that be Longboat Key?) got themselves exempted. And large developers managed to weigh in and properties subject to covenants, conditions and restrictions; articles of incorporation; or “bylaws” got some protections if the structures do not comply with the restrictions. So it’s been “Let’s make a deal” all month.

Although this bill is better from where it started, a bad bill is a bad bill and should be opposed. You can find the bill and its analysis and read it for yourselves at below links. Just click on the “Bill Text” or “Analysis” tabs and choose the document with the latest date. This bill changes frequently but both have cleared all their committees and are on the calendars for their respective floors to be voted on.

This year’s session ends in about 11 days, so this will move quickly and we expect it to pass unless there is a large public outcry.

Senate Bill 596 –

House Bill 687 – 

Some reasons to oppose:

1) Home Rule – This bill preempts local authority over their public rights of way and zoning authority

2) This bill is not necessary, locals are capable of negotiating directly with industry on what is needed for their communities

3) This bill picks winners and losers which is not the role of the state. Wireless facilities are placed today on both public and private property. By setting a low rate for public properties you skew the market. These light poles, etc. were paid for by the people and their local representatives should be allowed to negotiate the proper price. Testimony at one House committee meeting pegged market rate at $2200/yr and this bill only offers $150/year. Taxpayers should not subsidize private industry.

4) 50 foot mini cell towers and noisy associated equipment boxes should not be forced on residential areas.

5) This bill is discriminatory as it does not treat all public rights of way the same – namely the carve outs for the Florida Dept of Transportation, municipal electric utilities, The Villages, Barrier islands and certain PUD’s (planned unit developments)

6) The massive proliferation of small cell placements, especially in residential areas, where placement could be as close as 10 feet from a bedroom window, is a health hazard. This deployment should not be supported in light of the May 2016 release of the NTP rat/cell phone study until the FCC completes its work on Docket 16-421 regarding reassessment of the RF radiation emission guidelines.

7) A good write up, complete with pictures, was prepared by a former government local planner who is opposing a similar pending bill in California. It shows what happens when the placement and rules of wireless facilities are not well regulated and controlled. See

8) Ohio passed their bill in December and over 80 local communities are now suing the state.

Please make some noise in opposition to this. Most times these senators and representatives go along with these crazy bills because they hear no complaints from the people. Tell them to Vote NO.

Thank you,

Stop Smart Meters, Florida

This entry was posted in 5G, Cellphone hazards, FCC Corruption, Fire Hazard, Health Effects, Interference, Internet of Things, Radio-frequency Radiation, SB 596, SB596, Wireless health hazards, wireless infrastructure and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *