Smart Meter Deployments: Based upon Biased and False Assumptions for Providing Eco-Feedback to Consumers (Part 2)

[Please see also:

Assessing the Prevalence of Bias in Studies Showing Savings Linked to Energy Consumption Feedback (Part 1)
https://smartgridawareness.org/2016/06/03/accounting-for-bias-in-energy-consumption-feedback-studies/

… plus other recent articles documenting the (so-called) ‘Smart Meter’ scam, here:
https://smartgridawareness.org/ ]

———–

Smart Meter Deployments: Based upon Biased and False Assumptions for Providing Eco-Feedback to Consumers (Part 2)

What if the billions and billions of dollars being spent to deploy so-called “smart meters” smart-meter-enabled-eco-feedback-imagewere found to be justified based upon biased and false assumptions?  Should consumers still be required to pay for smart meters that were erroneously promoted as being installed for their benefit, i.e., to help them manage their energy bills?

This article will demonstrate that based upon the latest research and under the most optimistic circumstances, consumers within the general population might reduce their energy consumption by only as much as 0.5 to 0.7 % if they have access to enhanced feedback from smart meters.

Continue here:

https://smartgridawareness.org/2016/06/05/smart-meter-deployments-based-on-biased-and-false-assumptions/

This entry was posted in Green Washing, Higher Bills and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *