‘Smart’ Meters, Urgent! Please contact PSC, TODAY, re: Extortionate ‘Opt-out’ Fees

‘Smart’ Meters, Urgent! Please contact PSC, TODAY, re: Extortionate ‘Opt-out’ Fees… Deadline Today for Comments…

Tomorrow, January 7th, the Florida Public Service Commission will take up the smart meter issue. Please CALL ~and~ EMAIL today, and tell the Commissioners that you strongly OPPOSE the extortionate fees requested by FP&L to levy against FP&L customers who REFUSE the dangerous, non-UL listed, radiation-emitting, privacy-invading, so-called “smart” meters.

You have a right to REFUSE the ‘smart’ meter, and you should NOT be penalized for doing so!

*** CALL ***
At prompt, press “2” to reach the “consumer advocacy & assistance” desk

*** EMAIL ***
Please contact the Public Service Commissioners directly.

Very important that you put “Comments for Docket # 130223 in the Subject line. 

Public Service Commission e-mail addresses are as follows:

Commissioner Eduardo E. Balbis: Commissioner.Balbis@psc.state.fl.us
Commissioner Julie Imanuel Brown: Commissioner.Brown@psc.state.fl.us
Commissioner Ronald A. Brise: Chairman.Brise@psc.state.fl.us
Commissioner Lisa Polak Edgar: Commissioner.Edgar@psc.state.fl.us
Commissioner Art Graham: Commissioner.Graham@psc.state.fl.us
Office of Commission Clerk: clerk@psc.state.fl.us

*PSC claims to be under the false impression that only 30-40 Florida citizens care
about the smart meter! Remind them that 36,000 (as reported by Anthony
Westbury in yesterday’s Scripps TCPalm News) customers told FPL they do
not want a smart meter! Remind them that several cities and counties have
resolutions against smart meters.

**Please forward this email, and pass this number (800-342-3552 , “2” at prompt) on to others – burn up the wires! This is Florida’s number one consumer revolt!

Some Talking Points (not all inclusive):

** If you are a FP&L customer and don’t have a smart meter, please note that in your comments up front.

** Not only should this petition be suspended but it should be put on hold pending full evidentiary public hearings on smart meters from a cost, health, privacy and security perspective. In light of the recent NSA scandals and also all the Federal Government concerns and potential mandates on cyber-security for the grid, as well as the fact that FP&L’s own estimates from the recent rate case do not show savings to the ratepayer, it is time to re-evaluate.

** Opt Out’s alleviate some concerns but not all. What happens to the multi-family dwellings? How does someone with 10-100 meters behind their wall “opt out”? You can’t. What happens to the residents that are getting sick from their neighbors meters or the associated equipment outside their unit on the poles?

** What exactly is a “non-standard” meter? Those opting out want to retain their analog meters and do not want a non-communicating meter (digital). (This is important as California found that the digital meters were still making people sick because of the dirty electricity it produced on their home electrical lines.)

** Those opting out should not have to pay a fee to protect their health and privacy. The smart meters cost approx. 5 times more than the analog and their estimated useful life is half. They require more equipment (routers, repeaters, IT maintenance, security, software, telecom fees, etc.) than analogs. The cost is far greater. Weather events will cost more as there is now additional sensitive communication equipment that can be damaged and will need replacement

** As FP&L admitted in Docket # 130160, smart meters stop communicating. FP&L needs a method to get the meter reads in for the smart meters that don’t work properly. FP&L could use the same programs to get the manual meter reads in for the opt outs. They don’t need to write separate programs.

** Monthly manual meter reads are not required for those opting out. FP&L could do one of two things. Either do estimated billing based on history or have the customer submit their own meter reading. Once a year FP&L should be coming out to all customers (regardless of which meter they have) to inspect their equipment on our property to make sure it is in good working order. They could do a meter read at that time to verify that the customer was doing proper readings. In addition, customers could also submit digital photos of their meter to support their readings. No need for monthly charges.

**There is PLENTY of precedent of services be performed for “some” customers and not “all” and no fee is charged. Examples, 1) spanish translations of materials, customers service, 2) brail bills, 3) TDDY services for the deaf, 4) home energy audit.

Florida Public Service Commission to take up Smart Meters January 7, 2014

FPL “Smart Meter” Opt-Out: Final Comments Due January 7, 2014!

‘Smart’ meter hazards and problems:

FPL to Charge for “smart-meter” Opt-Out! Please Contact Florida PSC!

Florida “Smart” Meter RESOLUTIONS

This entry was posted in Fire Hazard. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *